Diagnostics for comparing robust and least squares fits

Is a simple least squares (LS) fit appropriate for the data at hand? How different would a more robust estimate be from LS? Is a high breakdown estimator necessary, or is a highly efficient robust estimator sufficient? We propose diagnostics which help answer these questions by measuring the differe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of nonparametric statistics Vol. 11; no. 1-3; pp. 161 - 188
Main Authors Mc Kean, Joseph W., Naranjo, Joshua D., Sheather, Simon J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Gordon and Breach Science Publishers 01.01.1999
Subjects
Bounded influence
GR-estimates
high breakdown
linear model
outlier
R-estimates
rank based methods
regression diagnostics
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Is a simple least squares (LS) fit appropriate for the data at hand? How different would a more robust estimate be from LS? Is a high breakdown estimator necessary, or is a highly efficient robust estimator sufficient? We propose diagnostics which help answer these questions by measuring the difference in fits between least squares and, successively, a highly efficient robust estimate and a bounded influence robust estimate. Our diagnostic TDBETAS measures the overall change in parameter estimates among these three fits, while the casewise diagnostic CFITS measures change in individual fitted values. We also propose a plot based on CFITS which provides an effective graphical summary of underlying data structure.
ISSN:1048-5252
1029-0311
DOI:10.1080/10485259908832779