Low Back Pain: Current Patterns of Canadian Physiotherapy Service Delivery

The aim of this study was to describe the current patterns of service delivery of Canadian physiotherapy (PT) professionals working in adult musculoskeletal (MSK) outpatient practice. A total of 846 Canadian PT professionals working with an adult MSK outpatient clientele participated in an online su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysiotherapy Canada Vol. 69; no. 1; pp. 49 - 56
Main Authors Orozco, Tatiana, Feldman, Debbie E, Mazer, Barbara, Chilingaryan, Gevorg, Hunt, Matthew, Williams-Jones, Bryn, Laliberté, Maude
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Canada University of Toronto Press 01.01.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this study was to describe the current patterns of service delivery of Canadian physiotherapy (PT) professionals working in adult musculoskeletal (MSK) outpatient practice. A total of 846 Canadian PT professionals working with an adult MSK outpatient clientele participated in an online survey about how they would treat a patient with low back pain (LBP). After reading an online clinical vignette about a fictional patient with varying insurance status, participants answered questions about how they would treat the patient (e.g., wait time, frequency and duration of treatment, time allotted for initial evaluation and treatment), about their actual practice (e.g., number of patients seen per day), and about their work setting. The vignette patients with LBP would typically be seen within 2 weeks, especially in private practice, and most would receive care 2-3 times per week for 1-3 months. Initial evaluations and subsequent treatments would take 31-60 minutes. Two-thirds of participants reported treating 6-15 patients a day in their current practice setting. Differences were found between provinces and territories (with the longest wait time in Quebec), practice settings (with a longer wait time in the public sector), and insurance status (patients covered by workers' compensation are seen more frequently). This study adds to our knowledge of the accessibility of outpatient MSK PT services for patients with LBP in Canada, and it points to potential areas for improvement.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Acknowledgements: The authors thank the Canadian physiotherapy professionals who participated in the survey. The authors also thank Anne Hudon for her assistance in preparing the vignette and the experts who reviewed the vignettes in the preliminary validation phase (including Max Folkersma, Alison Hoens, and Jean-Louis Larochelle). The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the physiotherapy associations and collaborators who distributed the vignettes: Yukon Council, Nova Scotia College of Physiotherapists, Nova Scotia Physiotherapy Association, Atlantic Physiotherapy Association, College of Physiotherapists of New Brunswick, Ontario Physiotherapy Association, Physiotherapy Alberta (College and Association), Ordre professionnel de la physiothérapie du Québec, Fédération des cliniques privées de physiothérapie du Québec, Physiotherapy Association of British Columbia, College of Physiotherapists of British Columbia, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, and Private Practice Division of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association. Finally, the authors thank Nelly Huynh and Eve Desplats for their help with using the REDCap platform for data collection and Myrian Grondin for her help during the submission process.
Competing Interests: None declared. Tatiana Orozco is supported by the Quebec Research Rehabilitation Network (summer research bursary) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (research assistant on a research grant). Matthew Hunt is supported by a Research Scholar award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé. Maude Laliberté holds a doctoral fellowship from the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé. Financial support for this work was also received from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR – grant number EOG-120255).
Contributors: All authors designed the study; or collected, analyzed, or interpreted the data; and drafted or critically revised the article and approved the final draft.
ISSN:0300-0508
1708-8313
DOI:10.3138/ptc.2015-72