Pharmacokinetic parameters of once―daily rilpivirine following administration of efavirenz in healthy subjects
Rilpivirine and efavirenz share metabolic pathways (CYP3A), potentially leading to drug-drug interactions. We report the pharmacokinetics, ex vivo antiviral activity and safety of rilpivirine, following efavirenz treatment. HIV-negative adults received in fixed sequence: treatment A (rilpivirine 25...
Saved in:
Published in | Antiviral therapy Vol. 17; no. 3; pp. 439 - 446 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
International Medical Press
01.01.2012
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Rilpivirine and efavirenz share metabolic pathways (CYP3A), potentially leading to drug-drug interactions. We report the pharmacokinetics, ex vivo antiviral activity and safety of rilpivirine, following efavirenz treatment.
HIV-negative adults received in fixed sequence: treatment A (rilpivirine 25 mg once daily for 14 days, followed by a washout), treatment B (efavirenz 600 mg once daily for 14 days), immediately followed by treatment C (rilpivirine 25 mg once daily for 28 days). Rilpivirine pharmacokinetic profiles were determined on days 1 and 14 of treatment A and days 1, 14, 21 and 28 of treatment C. Ex vivo antiviral activity was measured in treatments A and C using an exploratory assay. Safety was evaluated throughout.
From days 1 to 21, higher mean rilpivirine exposure was observed with treatment A compared with treatment C. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(24 h)) least squares (LS) means ratio (90% CI) for treatment C versus treatment A was 0.54 (0.46, 0.64; Day 1), 0.82 (0.75, 0.89; Day 14) and 0.84 (0.74, 0.94; Day 21). By day 28 of treatment C, the main rilpivirine pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to day 14 of treatment A (AUC(24 h) LS means ratio [90% CI], 0.91 [0.82, 1.01]), except for the minimum plasma concentration. At each time point in treatment C, samples of >80% of subjects demonstrated similar ex vivo antiviral activity compared with treatment A. All adverse events were grade 1 or 2.
These results provide useful information supporting a clinical study evaluating HIV-1-positive subjects switching from efavirenz to rilpivirine. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Report-3 ObjectType-Case Study-4 |
ISSN: | 1359-6535 2040-2058 |
DOI: | 10.3851/IMP1959 |