Pharmacokinetic parameters of once―daily rilpivirine following administration of efavirenz in healthy subjects

Rilpivirine and efavirenz share metabolic pathways (CYP3A), potentially leading to drug-drug interactions. We report the pharmacokinetics, ex vivo antiviral activity and safety of rilpivirine, following efavirenz treatment. HIV-negative adults received in fixed sequence: treatment A (rilpivirine 25...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAntiviral therapy Vol. 17; no. 3; pp. 439 - 446
Main Authors CRAUWELS, Herta, VINGERHOETS, Johan, RYAN, Robert, WITEK, James, ANDERSON, David
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London International Medical Press 01.01.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Rilpivirine and efavirenz share metabolic pathways (CYP3A), potentially leading to drug-drug interactions. We report the pharmacokinetics, ex vivo antiviral activity and safety of rilpivirine, following efavirenz treatment. HIV-negative adults received in fixed sequence: treatment A (rilpivirine 25 mg once daily for 14 days, followed by a washout), treatment B (efavirenz 600 mg once daily for 14 days), immediately followed by treatment C (rilpivirine 25 mg once daily for 28 days). Rilpivirine pharmacokinetic profiles were determined on days 1 and 14 of treatment A and days 1, 14, 21 and 28 of treatment C. Ex vivo antiviral activity was measured in treatments A and C using an exploratory assay. Safety was evaluated throughout. From days 1 to 21, higher mean rilpivirine exposure was observed with treatment A compared with treatment C. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(24 h)) least squares (LS) means ratio (90% CI) for treatment C versus treatment A was 0.54 (0.46, 0.64; Day 1), 0.82 (0.75, 0.89; Day 14) and 0.84 (0.74, 0.94; Day 21). By day 28 of treatment C, the main rilpivirine pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to day 14 of treatment A (AUC(24 h) LS means ratio [90% CI], 0.91 [0.82, 1.01]), except for the minimum plasma concentration. At each time point in treatment C, samples of >80% of subjects demonstrated similar ex vivo antiviral activity compared with treatment A. All adverse events were grade 1 or 2. These results provide useful information supporting a clinical study evaluating HIV-1-positive subjects switching from efavirenz to rilpivirine.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-3
ObjectType-Case Study-4
ISSN:1359-6535
2040-2058
DOI:10.3851/IMP1959