Contemporary practice and short-term outcomes after liver resections in a complete national cohort

Background Improved outcome after liver resections have been reported in several series, but outcomes from national cohorts are scarce. Our aim was to evaluate nationwide practice and short-term outcomes after liver surgery in a universal healthcare system. Methods A complete 5-year cohort of all li...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLangenbeck's archives of surgery Vol. 404; no. 1; pp. 11 - 19
Main Authors Lassen, Kristoffer, Nymo, Linn Såve, Olsen, Frank, Brudvik, Kristoffer Watten, Fretland, Åsmund Avdem, Søreide, Kjetil
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.02.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Improved outcome after liver resections have been reported in several series, but outcomes from national cohorts are scarce. Our aim was to evaluate nationwide practice and short-term outcomes after liver surgery in a universal healthcare system. Methods A complete 5-year cohort of all liver resections from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR). Short-term outcomes were aggregated length of stay (a-LoS), reoperation and 90-day mortality. Results Of 2118 liver resections, 605 (28.6%) were major, median age was 65 years and 1184 (55%) were male. Most common indication was metastatic disease ( n  = 1554; 73.4%) and primary malignancy ( n  = 328; 15.3%). Laparoscopy was performed in 513 (33.9%) of minor and 37 (6.1%) of major liver resections and increased over time to 39.1% of minor resections in 2016. Median a-LoS was 12 days for major resections, 8 days for open minor and 3 days for laparoscopic minor resections. Reoperation was reported for 159 (7.4%) and 90-day mortality for 44 (2.1%). Primary malignancy, male gender, elderly patients and major resections were associated with poorer outcome. Conclusions In a national cohort, laparoscopy is used for a substantial proportion of minor resections and was associated with reduced a-LoS. Risk factors for reoperation and mortality were male gender, increased age and major resection for primary malignancy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1435-2443
1435-2451
DOI:10.1007/s00423-018-1737-3