Satisfaction in rhinoplasty: the possible impact of anxiety and functional outcome

• Published in: European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology Vol. 275; no. 3; pp. 729 - 733
• Main Authors: Koybasi, Serap, Bicer, Yusuf Ozgur, Seyhan, Sinan, Kesgin, Selcan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.03.2018
• Subjects: Head and Neck Surgery; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neurosurgery; Otorhinolaryngology; Rhinology; Anxiety; Satisfaction; Rhinoplasty
• ISSN: 0937-4477; 1434-4726
• DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4860-9

Background Rhinoplasty is a complex but commonly applied surgical procedure. Patient satisfaction is the least discussed but one of the most important determinants of surgical success. Objectives Evaluation of the patient satisfaction together with surgeon satisfaction were the main goals of this study. The roles of anxiety, gender, age and follow-up period were also studied. Patients and methods 53 eligible patients operated by the first two authors within the previous 2 years were enrolled in the study. The medical records were reviewed for demographic data as well as the details of the surgical procedure. Functional and esthetic satisfactions of the patients were evaluated by VAS and ROE respectively. Surgeon satisfaction was evaluated by VAS in crosswise manner. Anxiety was measured by STAI_s and STAI_t scales. Results The analysis concerning esthetic results as well as functional results did not reveal any significant difference between the two surgeons ( p  = 0.132, p  = 0.43 respectively). ROE scores were significantly different among patients with “good” and “very good” functional results. The difference between surgeon satisfaction and patient satisfaction was found to be insignificant ( p  = 0.273). Correlation analysis yielded a positive correlation between STAI_I and STAI_II (Pearson r  = 0.335, p  = 0.014) but not between STAI scores and ROE scores. Moreover, there was no relation between anxiety scores and the functional results. Likely, gender as well as age, follow-up, and surgical technique were not found to have any effect on patient satisfaction either. Conclusion Patient satisfaction is preferential in rhinoplasty. In our patient series, patient satisfaction was shown to be correlated with functional outcome but not with surgeon satisfaction. Anxiety was not found to have a significant impact on results of rhinoplasty. Our results should be interpreted cautiously keeping in mind that our patients’ primary drive for rhinoplasty was functional.