Poroelastic models for fault reactivation in response to concurrent injection and production in stacked reservoirs

• Published in: Geomechanics for energy and the environment Vol. 24; p. 100181
• Main Authors: Haddad, Mahdi, Eichhubl, Peter
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2020
• Subjects: Coupled poroelasticity; Fault mechanics; Finite element numerical simulation; Induced seismicity; Reservoir geomechanics; Wastewater disposal; Fault mechanics; Induced seismicity; Coupled poroelasticity; Wastewater disposal; Finite element numerical simulation; Reservoir geomechanics
• ISSN: 2352-3808; 2352-3808
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gete.2020.100181

Concurrent production and injection in stacked reservoirs as commonly conducted in unconventional resource exploitation potentially influences reactivation of nearby faults. Using three-dimensional, fully-coupled poroelastic finite-element simulations, we assessed the potential for reactivation of a barrier normal fault in a normal-faulting stress regime for twelve generic injection–production scenarios that differ in the depth of injection and production, and in the position and distance relative to the dipping fault plane. The simulations display significant variation in the Coulomb failure stress (CFS) with depth along the fault plane for these scenarios, reflecting differences in pore pressure distribution and associated poroelastic changes in normal and shear stress across the fault. Based on the CFS trends with depth we find that 1.) concurrent production and injection reduces or increases the fault reactivation potential in the injection reservoir depending on the lateral position and the distance of the wellbores relative to the fault plane; 2.) the fault is most prone to reactivation with stacked wellbores and injection into the upper reservoir within the hanging wall or the lower reservoir within the footwall, and 3.) the fault is least prone to injection-induced reactivation for stacked wellbores and injection into the lower reservoir within the hanging wall at wellbore-to-fault distances ten times the reservoir thickness. With decreasing wellbore-to-fault distance, induced poroelastic shear stresses and thus CFS increase, making injection only into the lower reservoir, without concurrent production, the most stable configuration at close distance. These simulations demonstrate the importance of the coupled poroelastic effects and of the three-dimensional arrangement of injection and production wellbores on fault reactivation. Our results are intended to provide general guidance for further detailed site-specific geomechanical evaluations needed for induced seismic hazard assessment. •Three-dimensional arrangement of injection and production affects fault stability.•Depending on this arrangement, production may or may not favor fault stability.•Poroelastic analysis of reservoirs helps optimize their disposal capacity.