Double Machine Learning for Sample Selection Models

This article considers the evaluation of discretely distributed treatments when outcomes are only observed for a subpopulation due to sample selection or outcome attrition. For identification, we combine a selection-on-observables assumption for treatment assignment with either selection-on-observab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of business & economic statistics Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 958 - 969
Main Authors Bia, Michela, Huber, Martin, Lafférs, Lukáš
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Alexandria Taylor & Francis 02.07.2024
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article considers the evaluation of discretely distributed treatments when outcomes are only observed for a subpopulation due to sample selection or outcome attrition. For identification, we combine a selection-on-observables assumption for treatment assignment with either selection-on-observables or instrumental variable assumptions concerning the outcome attrition/sample selection process. We also consider dynamic confounding, meaning that covariates that jointly affect sample selection and the outcome may (at least partly) be influenced by the treatment. To control in a data-driven way for a potentially high dimensional set of pre- and/or post-treatment covariates, we adapt the double machine learning framework for treatment evaluation to sample selection problems. We make use of (a) Neyman-orthogonal, doubly robust, and efficient score functions, which imply the robustness of treatment effect estimation to moderate regularization biases in the machine learning-based estimation of the outcome, treatment, or sample selection models and (b) sample splitting (or cross-fitting) to prevent overfitting bias. We demonstrate that the proposed estimators are asymptotically normal and root-n consistent and investigate their finite sample properties in a simulation study. We also apply our proposed methodology to the Job Corps data. The estimator is available in the causalweight package for the statistical software R.
ISSN:0735-0015
1537-2707
DOI:10.1080/07350015.2023.2271071