Direct shear tests of shear strength of soils reinforced by geomats and plant roots

To investigate the shear strength of root–geomat reinforced soil (RMS), direct shear tests were conducted in laboratory on soil samples cultivated with three–dimensional geomats and Bermuda grass. The test results showed that the shear strength of RMS could be significantly improved by the combined...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeotextiles and geomembranes Vol. 47; no. 6; pp. 780 - 791
Main Authors Tan, Huiming, Chen, Fumao, Chen, Jia, Gao, Yufeng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Essex Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2019
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To investigate the shear strength of root–geomat reinforced soil (RMS), direct shear tests were conducted in laboratory on soil samples cultivated with three–dimensional geomats and Bermuda grass. The test results showed that the shear strength of RMS could be significantly improved by the combined reinforcement with grass roots and geomats, particularly at a low vertical stress level. The shear strength increment was increased exponentially with the total reinforcement content of roots and geomats. Concurrently, the soil cohesion was significantly increased, but the influence on the friction angle was generally negligible. With the increase in root or geomat content and decrease in water content, both the soil shear strength and cohesion were remarkably increased. Owing to the higher tensile strength of geomat than that of roots, the effect of geomat content on shear strength was larger than that of root content. Furthermore, the shear strength increment caused by root–geomat reinforcement was larger than the sum of the respective increments caused by root and geomat. Moreover, the soil shear strength and cohesion increments induced by the combined root–geomat mutual interlocking effect were increased exponentially with the total reinforcement content.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0266-1144
1879-3584
DOI:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103491