What We Didn’t Learn Because of Who Would Not Talk to Us

Qualitative researchers relish the knowledge derived from multiple perspectives. They pride themselves on capturing the complexity of their informants’ experiences, they savor their ways of describing them, and they build models grounded in their narratives. Seldom do qualitative researchers ponder...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inQualitative health research Vol. 9; no. 6; pp. 829 - 835
Main Authors Groger, Lisa, Mayberry, Pamela S., Straker, Jane K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE Publications 01.11.1999
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Bias
Black American people
Black people
Caregivers
Choice
Elderly people
Long term care
Long term health care
Older people
Qualitative research
Sampling
Studies
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Qualitative researchers relish the knowledge derived from multiple perspectives. They pride themselves on capturing the complexity of their informants’ experiences, they savor their ways of describing them, and they build models grounded in their narratives. Seldom do qualitative researchers ponder how their models might be different if those who refused to participate had talked to them. This article discusses sampling problems the authors encountered in a study of African American elders’ long-term care choices and preferences. They conducted 60 qualitative interviews with elders and caregivers of elders receiving one of three types of care: kin care, formal services, or nursing home care. Gatekeeper bias, refusals to participate, sampling frame, pragmatic constraints, and institutional barriers were major sources of sampling bias.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1049-7323
1552-7557
DOI:10.1177/104973299129122180