A proactive–reactive syndrome affects group success in an ant species

Lay Summary Ant colonies varied consistently in time and across contexts in their approaches to exploration, risk taking, food retrieval, and conspecific interactions. "Bold" colonies contained individuals who more readily explored novel environments, exhibited aggressive behaviors, and de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBehavioral ecology Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 118 - 125
Main Authors Blight, Olivier, Albet Díaz-Mariblanca, Gisela, Cerdá, Xim, Boulay, Raphaël
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford University Press 01.01.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Lay Summary Ant colonies varied consistently in time and across contexts in their approaches to exploration, risk taking, food retrieval, and conspecific interactions. "Bold" colonies contained individuals who more readily explored novel environments, exhibited aggressive behaviors, and demonstrated higher food-retrieval efficiency during competition trials. However, such colonies were also more risk prone: workers suffered higher mortality rates because they took unnecessary risks by foraging at high temperatures.Social insects have been particularly evolutionarily successful: they dominate terrestrial ecosystems all over the globe. Their success stems from their social organization, where one or a few individuals reproduce, whereas others carry out different colony tasks. From an evolutionary standpoint, social species are particularly interesting because natural selection acts at both the individual and colony levels. Therefore, we might expect to see selection acting simultaneously on personality at the individual level and colony level. In this study, we tested whether captive colonies of the ant Aphaenogaster senilis exhibited different behavioral types and evaluated their consequences for intraspecific competition. Our results demonstrate that colonies of the same age exposed to standardized laboratory conditions did indeed have different personalities. In addition, we found that A. senilis demonstrated a behavioral syndrome that included proactive and reactive behaviors: colonies varied in their approaches to exploration, risk taking, food retrieval, and conspecific interactions. This syndrome appears to be associated with a trade-off between competition for food resources and temperature-related foraging risks. "Bold" colonies contained individuals who more readily explored novel environments, exhibited aggressive behaviors, and demonstrated higher food-retrieval efficiency during intraspecific competition trials. However, such colonies were also more risk prone: workers suffered higher mortality rates because they more frequently foraged over their critical thermal maximum. The trade-off we observed under laboratory conditions might be key in maintaining colony-level personality, thus driving local-level adaptations in collective behavior.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1045-2249
1465-7279
DOI:10.1093/beheco/arv127