A general framework for identification of hyper-elastic membranes with moiré techniques and multi-point simulated annealing

• Published in: International journal of solids and structures Vol. 45; no. 24; pp. 6074 - 6099
• Main Authors: Cosola, E., Genovese, K., Lamberti, L., Pappalettere, C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2008
• Subjects: Hyper-elasticity; Inverse problems; Mechanical characterization; Moiré; Simulated annealing; Hyper-elasticity; Inverse problems; Mechanical characterization; Simulated annealing; Moiré
• ISSN: 0020-7683; 1879-2146
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.07.019

This paper presents a hybrid procedure for mechanical characterization of hyper-elastic materials based on moiré, finite element analysis and global optimization. The characterization process is absolutely general because does not require any assumption on specimen geometry, loading or/and boundary conditions. The novel experimental approach followed in this research relies on a proper combination of intrinsic moiré and projection moiré which allows 3D displacement components to be measured simultaneously and independently using always the same experimental setup and just one single camera. In order to properly compare experimental data and finite element predictions, 3D displacement information encoded in moiré patterns which are relative to the deformed configuration taken by the specimen are expressed in the reference system of the unloaded state. A global optimization algorithm based on multi-level and multi-point simulated annealing which keeps memory of all best records generated in the optimization is used in order to find the unknown material properties through the minimization of the Ω functional built by summing over the differences between displacements measured experimentally and those predicted numerically. Feasibility, efficiency and robustness of the proposed methodology are demonstrated for both isotropic and anisotropic specimens subject to increasing pressure loads: a natural rubber membrane and a glutaraldehyde treated bovine pericardium patch, respectively. Remarkably, the results of the characterization process are in very good agreement with target data independently determined. For the isotropic specimen, the maximum error on hyper-elastic constants is less than 1% and the residual error on displacements is less than 3.5%. For the anisotropic specimen, the maximum error on material properties is about 3.5% while the residual error on displacements is less than 3%. The identification process fails or becomes less reliable if “local” displacement values are considered.