THIRD-EPOCH MAGELLANIC CLOUD PROPER MOTIONS. I. HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE /WFC3 DATA AND ORBIT IMPLICATIONS

• Published in: The Astrophysical journal Vol. 764; no. 2; pp. 161 - 24
• Main Authors: Kallivayalil, Nitya, van der Marel, Roeland P., Besla, Gurtina, Anderson, Jay, Alcock, Charles
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 20.02.2013
• Subjects: ASTRONOMY; ASTROPHYSICS; ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY; Control systems; GALACTIC EVOLUTION; Hubble Space Telescope; MAGELLANIC CLOUDS; MILKY WAY; ORBITS; Permissible error; PROPER MOTION; Random errors; RANDOMNESS; SPACE; Streams; Uncertainty; VELOCITY
• ISSN: 0004-637X; 1538-4357
• DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/161

We present proper motions for the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC) based on three epochs of Hubble Space Telescope data, spanning a ~7 yr baseline, and centered on fields with background QSOs. The first two epochs, the subject of past analyses, were obtained with ACS/HRC, and have been reanalyzed here. The new third epoch with WFC3/UVIS increases the time baseline and provides better control of systematics. The three-epoch data yield proper-motion random errors of only 1%-2% per field. For the LMC this is sufficient to constrain the internal proper-motion dynamics, as will be discussed in a separate paper.Herewe focus on the implied center-of-mass proper motions: mu sub(W) sub(,LMC) = -1.910 + or - 0.020 mas yr-1, mu sub(N) sub(,LMC) = 0.229 + or - 0.047 mas yr super(-1), and mu sub(W) sub(,SMC) = -0.772 + or - 0.063 mas yr-1, mu sub(N) sub(,SMC) = -1.117+ or -0.061 mas yr super(-1).We combine the results with a revised understanding of the solar motion in the MilkyWay to derive Galactocentric velocities: v sub(tot,LMC) = 321+ or -24 km s-1 and v sub(tot,SMC) = 217 + or - 26 km s super(-1). Our proper-motion uncertainties are now dominated by limitations in our understanding of the internal kinematics and geometry of theClouds, and our velocity uncertainties are dominated by distance errors. Orbit calculations for the Clouds around the Milky Way allow a range of orbital periods, depending on the uncertain masses of the Milky Way and LMC. Periods [lap]4 Gyr are ruled out, which poses a challenge for traditional Magellanic Stream models. First-infall orbits are preferred (as supported by other arguments as well) if one imposes the requirement that the LMC and SMC must have been a bound pair for at least several Gyr.