Adjoint design sensitivity analysis and optimization of nonlinear structures using geometrical mapping approach

•A new adjoint shape design sensitivity for contact nonlinear structures is formulated.•The new method utilizes geometrical mapping approach to derive shape variation velocity field.•An 80% reduction in computational cost with respect to direct differentiation method is obtained.•Using parameterized...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComputers & structures Vol. 183; pp. 1 - 13
Main Authors Wei, Yintao, Zhao, Chonglei, Yao, Zhenhan, Hauret, Patrice, Li, Xuebing, Kaliske, Michael
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Ltd 15.04.2017
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•A new adjoint shape design sensitivity for contact nonlinear structures is formulated.•The new method utilizes geometrical mapping approach to derive shape variation velocity field.•An 80% reduction in computational cost with respect to direct differentiation method is obtained.•Using parameterized tire shape arcs, boundary design velocities can be explicitly calculated.•A useful framework for sensitivity analysis of contact nonlinear structures is established. A new adjoint shape design sensitivity formulation for nonlinear structures subject to contact forces is developed. The method is based on a geometrical mapping approach where shape variation is regarded as a mapping characterized by the shape variation velocity field. An adjoint variable method is developed for performing sensitivity analysis of the average shear strain in the tire belt area, which profile is properly parameterized in function of arcs, allowing explicit design velocities calculated. It can be seen that the present method is much faster than the direct differentiation method and more accurate than the classical finite difference scheme.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0045-7949
1879-2243
DOI:10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.01.004