A design procedure for dual eccentrically braced-moment resisting frames in the framework of Eurocode 8

•The paper proposes a design procedure for dual eccentrically braced-moment resisting frames.•The proposed procedure is consistent with Eurocode 8.•The behaviour factor q for the determination of the seismic design force is provided.•Dual and conventional EBFs are compared in terms of performance an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEngineering structures Vol. 130; pp. 198 - 215
Main Authors Bosco, M., Marino, E.M., Rossi, P.P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2017
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•The paper proposes a design procedure for dual eccentrically braced-moment resisting frames.•The proposed procedure is consistent with Eurocode 8.•The behaviour factor q for the determination of the seismic design force is provided.•Dual and conventional EBFs are compared in terms of performance and structural weight. Several research studies have proved the beneficial effects resulting from the presence of moment resisting frames and braced frames in dual structural systems. Nonetheless, Eurocode 8 provides design rules only for dual systems with moment resisting frames and concentrically braced frames and thus ignores that moment resisting frames may beneficially combine with other types of braced frames. In this paper, a design procedure for dual systems with moment resisting frames and eccentrically braced frames is proposed based on the current design provisions of Eurocode 8 for dual structures with moment resisting frames and concentrically braced frames. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed procedure, the seismic response of the designed systems is evaluated through incremental nonlinear dynamic analysis. The buildings considered are founded on hard or soft soil and are characterised by different values of the link length and number of storeys.
ISSN:0141-0296
1873-7323
DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.059