Simple method for estimating regurgitant volume with use of a single radius for measuring proximal isovelocity surface area: an in vitro study of simulated mitral regurgitation

• Published in: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography Vol. 14; no. 2; p. 104
• Main Authors: Tokushima, T, Reid, C L, Hata, A, Gardin, J M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.02.2001
• Subjects: Echocardiography, Doppler, Color; Humans; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging
• ISSN: 0894-7317
• DOI: 10.1067/mje.2001.108198

The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) color Doppler method with use of a hemielliptic formula is reported to be accurate for quantitating regurgitant volume (RV). However, this formula ideally requires the measurement of 2 or 3 radii and therefore is not widely used clinically. The purpose of this in vitro study was to derive a simple PISA formula for estimating RV with use of a single radius axial to the valve orifice and to compare it with the clinically used single-radius hemispherical formula (2 x pi R(2) x AV x TVI/Vp), where AV is the apparent color Doppler aliasing velocity, R is the PISA color Doppler aliasing radius, TVI is time-velocity integral of the jet by continuous wave Doppler, and Vp is the peak velocity of the jet by continuous wave Doppler. Pulsatile flow studies were performed across a convex curvilinear surface, which more closely approximates the shape of the mitral valve than does a planar surface. Pulse rates (60 to 80 bpm), peak flow velocities (4.0 to 6.0 m/s), and regurgitant orifice areas (0.2 to 1.0 cm(2)) were varied to simulate mitral regurgitation. The AVs were varied from 11 to 39 cm/s, and a single PISA aliasing radius was measured at each AV. Excellent linear correlations were obtained between the PISA radius and the actual RV measured with use of a beaker (r = 0.94 to 0.97, P <.0001). A series of simplified formulas was derived from the regression line of the PISA radius versus the RV. For example, with an AV of 21 cm/s, RV was estimated by a simplified PISA formula (where RV[mL] = 10 x R [mm] - 30) with an accuracy of 3.3 +/- 6.3 mL versus -20.3 +/- 8.7 mL for the standard single-radius PISA method (P <.0001). By using the standard single-radius hemispherical PISA formula, RV was underestimated if the radius was <20 mm. By using simplified regression equations, the PISA radius accurately estimated RV at a PISA radius <20 mm. Clinical studies are necessary to validate this concept.