Measuring the global mechanical properties of the human thorax: Costo-vertebral articulation
Biomechanical simulation of the human thorax, e.g. for 3D-printed rib implant optimisation, requires an accurate knowledge of the associated articulation and tissue stiffness. The present study is focusing on determining the stiffness of the costo-vertebral articulations. Specimens of rib segments i...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of biomechanics Vol. 163; p. 111923 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Ltd
01.01.2024
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Biomechanical simulation of the human thorax, e.g. for 3D-printed rib implant optimisation, requires an accurate knowledge of the associated articulation and tissue stiffness. The present study is focusing on determining the stiffness of the costo-vertebral articulations.
Specimens of rib segments including the adjacent thoracic vertebrae and ligaments were obtained from two human post-mortem bodies at four different rib levels. The rib samples were loaded with a tensile force in the local longitudinal, sagittal and transverse direction and the resulting displacement was continuously measured. The moment–angle response of the rib articulations was also determined by applying a load at the rib end in the cranial – caudal direction and measuring the resulting displacement.
The torsional load response of the costo-vertebral articulations at an applied moment between −0.1 Nm and 0.1 Nm corresponded to a median range of motion of 13.2° (6.4° to 20.9°). An almost uniform stiffness was measured in all tensile loading directions. The median displacement at the defined force of 28 N was 1.41 mm in the longitudinal, 1.55 mm in the sagittal, and 1.08 mm in the transverse direction.
The measured moment–angle response of the costo-vertebral articulation is in line with the data from literature. On the contrary, larger displacements in longitudinal, sagittal and transverse directions were measured compared to the values found in literature. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111923 |