Analysis of Chlorhexidine Modified Cement in Orthodontic Patients: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial

• Published in: European journal of dentistry Vol. 15; no. 4; pp. 639 - 646
• Main Authors: Araújo, José Lucas dos Santos, Alvim, Mariana Massi Afonso, Campos, Márcio José da Silva, Apolônio, Ana Carolina Morais, Carvalho, Fabíola Galbiatti, Lacerda-Santos, Rogério
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd 01.10.2021
• Subjects: Original; Original Article; microbiota; orthodontic; glass ionomer cement; chlorhexidine
• ISSN: 1305-7456; 1305-7464
• DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727556

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the microbiological and mechanical properties of glass ionomer cement (GIC) modified by chlorhexidine (CLX) for the purpose of cementing bands to the teeth of orthodontic patients. Materials and Methods Ten patients, between the ages of 19 and 33 years, in the initial stage of orthodontic treatment, were randomly designated to two groups using the split-mouth design ( n = 10). One group (GICEX) had bands cemented with GIC modified by CLX and a Control group (GIC), evaluated at time intervals before (T0), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T6) after cementation. Total microbiological counts were performed, and color stability of tooth enamel, salivary pH, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) were evaluated. Statistical Analysis The Friedman and Dunn’s tests, Mann–Whitney, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey, and paired and non-paired t -tests ( p < 0.05) were used. Results In T3, there was evidence of significant reduction in the quantity of colony forming unit (CFU) in GICEX group in comparison with the Control ( p = 0.041). In T6, the quantity of CFU was similar to the quantity in T3 and significantly different to control ( p = 0.045); Control group demonstrated a similar quantity of CFU between the experimental time intervals ( p = 0.066). Salivary pH demonstrated significant difference only between the time intervals T0 and T6 ( p = 0.022). The tooth enamel color ( p = 0.366) and ARI ( p = 0.343) values demonstrated no significant changes. Conclusion The incorporation of CLX into GIC demonstrated effective antibacterial action, allowed a good bond of the cement to the enamel, a high rate of survival of the bands, did not change the color of the tooth enamel, and maintained the salivary pH at physiological levels.