Patch-testing with hairdressing chemicals

Hairdressing chemicals may be associated with allergic contact dermatitis. To review our experience of patch-testing with hairdressing chemicals. We reviewed results from patients who underwent patch testing with our standard allergen series (including 15 hairdressing chemicals) and a supplementary...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDermatitis Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 16
Main Authors Wang, Michael Z, Farmer, Sara A, Richardson, Donna M, Davis, Mark D P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.01.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Hairdressing chemicals may be associated with allergic contact dermatitis. To review our experience of patch-testing with hairdressing chemicals. We reviewed results from patients who underwent patch testing with our standard allergen series (including 15 hairdressing chemicals) and a supplementary "hairdresser series" (18 additional hairdressing chemicals) at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN; Scottsdale, AZ; and Jacksonville, FL) from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2008. Two hundred ten patients (mean age, 53.8 years [SD, 16.9 yr]; female, 94.8%) were patch-tested. The most common sites of dermatitis were the scalp, face, and hands. Patients had widely varying occupations. The most common occupations were cosmetologist (10.5%), housewife (9.5%), and beautician (5.2%); 14.3% were retired. The hairdresser series detected 13 additional patients with allergies (6.4%; 204 patients tested with both series) who would not have been detected with the standard allergen series alone. The highest allergic patch-test rates in the supplemental hairdresser series were with ammonium persulfate (14.4%), 4-aminoazobenzene (13.4%), and pyrogallol (9.1%). Patch-testing with hairdressing-specific chemicals (standard series plus supplemental hairdresser series) was appropriate for numerous clinical situations and was not limited to patients in hair care occupations. The supplemental hairdresser series helped identify more patients than would have been identified with the standard series alone.
ISSN:2162-5220
DOI:10.2310/6620.2010.10061