Flash behavior increases prey survival

Flash behavior is an antipredator defense in which an otherwise cryptic prey displays conspicuous color patches during its escape but hides them on resettling. Using human subjects, we found that flash behavior increased the survival rate of escaping artificial prey, most likely because subjects exp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBehavioral ecology Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 528 - 533
Main Authors Loeffler-Henry, Karl, Kang, Changku, Yip, Yolanda, Caro, Tim, Sherratt, Thomas N
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published UK Oxford University Press 09.05.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Flash behavior is an antipredator defense in which an otherwise cryptic prey displays conspicuous color patches during its escape but hides them on resettling. Using human subjects, we found that flash behavior increased the survival rate of escaping artificial prey, most likely because subjects expected to see prey of a different appearance when they came to search for them. This study provides first proof of concept of one hypothesized benefit of flash behavior. Abstract Flash behavior, in which otherwise cryptic prey exhibit conspicuous coloration or noise when fleeing from potential predators, has been postulated to hinder location of prey once they become stationary. Here, using artificial computer-generated prey and humans as visual predators, we show that human subjects are more likely to abandon their search for prey that flash, compared to continuously cryptic fleeing controls. Survivorship of flashing prey was an additional 20% higher than the survivorship of continuously cryptic prey, depending on the background against which it was depicted. This survivorship advantage was consistent regardless of whether prey showed flash colors continuously or intermittently during flight. The advantage over continuously cryptic prey was highest when the flashing prey was presented first. Likewise, the more search areas containing no prey that the volunteers had initially viewed, the more likely they were to give up when there was a cryptic prey present. Collectively, these 3 findings indicate that volunteers inferred the flashing prey was absent from the search area when they failed to see a prey in the same form as they saw it move. Our results demonstrate first proof of concept: flash behavior, widely seen in taxa from insects to mammals, is an effective antipredator escape mechanism.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1045-2249
1465-7279
1465-7279
DOI:10.1093/beheco/ary030