Core ADHD Symptom Improvement With Atomoxetine Versus Methylphenidate A Direct Comparison Meta-Analysis

Objective: Previous studies comparing atomoxetine and methylphenidate to treat ADHD symptoms have been equivocal. This noninferiority meta-analysis compared core ADHD symptom response between atomoxetine and methylphenidate in children and adolescents. Method: Selection criteria included randomized,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of attention disorders Vol. 15; no. 8; pp. 674 - 683
Main Authors Hazell, Philip L., Kohn, Michael R., Dickson, Ruth, Walton, Richard J., Granger, Renee E., van Wyk, Gregory W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.11.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: Previous studies comparing atomoxetine and methylphenidate to treat ADHD symptoms have been equivocal. This noninferiority meta-analysis compared core ADHD symptom response between atomoxetine and methylphenidate in children and adolescents. Method: Selection criteria included randomized, controlled design; duration 6 weeks; and assessment of ADHD Rating Scale–IV–Parent Version: Investigator Administered and Scored (ADHDRS) scores. Six-week response rates, defined as ≥40% reduction in ADHDRS total score, were compared using a noninferiority margin of −15%. Results: Seven studies met inclusion criteria (N = 1,368). After 6 weeks, 53.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48.6%-58.4%) of atomoxetine-treated patients (n = 811) had responded compared with 54.4% (47.6%-61.1%) for methylphenidate (n = 557), with atomoxetine demonstrating noninferiority to methylphenidate (absolute difference −0.9%, 95% CI −9.2%-7.5%). Conclusion: After 6 weeks of treatment atomoxetine and methylphenidate had comparable efficacy in reducing core ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1087-0547
1557-1246
DOI:10.1177/1087054710379737