Ambulatory Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Does the Conventional Approach Need a Reappraisal?

, acute abdomen remains significant in abdominal pain. The entity of acute abdomen accounts for up to 10% of all emergency admissions. The differences between countries' income and level of prosperity are pertinent, particularly in terms of severity, radiological modalities, and surgical manage...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 14; no. 9; p. e29215
Main Authors Aydin, Ismail, Sengul, Ilker, Gungor, Mert, Kesicioglu, Tugrul, Sengul, Demet, Vural, Selahattin, Yimaz, Elmas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Springer Nature B.V 15.09.2022
Cureus
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:, acute abdomen remains significant in abdominal pain. The entity of acute abdomen accounts for up to 10% of all emergency admissions. The differences between countries' income and level of prosperity are pertinent, particularly in terms of severity, radiological modalities, and surgical management of the condition. Of note, surgical modalities have been the most widely used treatment modality, and current evidence indicates that the laparoscopic approach, , is the most effective surgical therapy with a lower incidence of wound infection, post-intervention morbidity, shorter hospital stay, and better quality of life scores compared to the conventional method. In light of this, the present study aimed to evaluate ambulatory appendectomy in a series of sequential laparoscopic appendectomies (LApp), which included both complicated and uncomplicated cases.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2168-8184
2168-8184
DOI:10.7759/cureus.29215