Use of a DNA hybridization method to verify results of screening for methicillin resistance in staphylococci

Tests were performed by the disk diffusion method, agar dilution method and the E test to determine the susceptibility to methicillin and oxacillin of clinical isolates and control strains of Staphylococcus aureus (n = 106) and coagulase-negative species (n = 131). Results were compared with those o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases Vol. 12; no. 7; p. 527
Main Authors Olsson-Liljequist, B, Larsson, P, Ringertz, S, Löfdahl, S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany 01.07.1993
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Tests were performed by the disk diffusion method, agar dilution method and the E test to determine the susceptibility to methicillin and oxacillin of clinical isolates and control strains of Staphylococcus aureus (n = 106) and coagulase-negative species (n = 131). Results were compared with those of a dot blot DNA hybridization test, in which the mecA gene was detected using an oligonucleotide probe selected from the mecA gene. Among the Staphylococcus aureus strains the mecA gene was found in all but two strains inhibited by > or = 8 mg/l of methicillin and all but two strains inhibited by > or = 4 mg/l of oxacillin. A disk test using either 1 microgram oxacillin or 10 micrograms methicillin and a tentative resistance breakpoint of < or = 10 mm gave the best agreement with the hybridization test. For coagulase-negative staphylococci 34 of 35 strains inhibited by > or = 8 mg/l methicillin hybridized with the probe as well as 58 of 82 strains inhibited by 1-4 mg/l; 93 of 97 strains inhibited by > or = 0.5 mg/l oxacillin were also positive in the probe test. Using the 1 microgram oxacillin disk and a resistance breakpoint of < or = 10 mm good agreement was obtained between results of the disk diffusion and DNA hybridization tests. It is suggested that this genotypic method for detection of methicillin resistance is used as a reference method for routine methods.
ISSN:0934-9723
DOI:10.1007/BF01970958