Development of a physiologic-based pharmacokinetic model for estimating sulfamethazine concentrations in swine and application to prediction of violative residues in edible tissues

• Published in: American journal of veterinary research Vol. 66; no. 10; p. 1686
• Main Authors: Buur, Jennifer L, Baynes, Ronald E, Craigmill, Arthur L, Riviere, Jim E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.10.2005
• Subjects: Adipose Tissue - metabolism; Animals; Injections, Intravenous - veterinary; Kidney - metabolism; Liver - metabolism; Models, Biological; Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism; Sulfamethazine - administration & dosage; Sulfamethazine - blood; Sulfamethazine - pharmacokinetics; Swine - metabolism; Tissue Distribution
• ISSN: 0002-9645
• DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1686

To develop a flow-limited, physiologic-based pharmacokinetic model for use in estimating concentrations of sulfamethazine after IV administration to swine. 4 published studies provided physiologic values for organ weights, blood flows, clearance, and tissue-to-blood partition coefficients, and 3 published studies provided data on plasma and other tissue compartments for model validation. For the parent compound, the model included compartments for blood, adipose, muscle, liver, and kidney tissue with an extra compartment representing the remaining carcass. Compartments for the N-acetyl metabolite included the liver and the remaining body. The model was created and optimized by use of computer software. Sensitivity analysis was completed to evaluate the importance of each constant on the whole model. The model was validated and used to estimate a withhold interval after an IV injection at a dose of 50 mg/kg. The withhold interval was compared to the interval estimated by the Food Animal Residue Avoidance Databank (FARAD). Specific tissue correlations for plasma, adipose, muscle, kidney, and liver tissue compartments were 0.93, 0.86, 0.99, 0.94, and 0.98, respectively. The model typically overpredicted concentrations at early time points but had excellent accuracy at later time points. The withhold interval estimated by use of the model was 120 hours, compared with 100 hours estimated by FARAD. Use of this model enabled accurate prediction of sulfamethazine pharmacokinetics in swine and has applications for food safety and prediction of drug residues in edible tissues.