Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging detection of intramyocardial hemorrhage in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction: comparison between susceptibility-weighted imaging and T1/T2 mapping techniques

Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and T1/T2 mapping can be used to detect reperfusion intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, the sensitivity and accuracy of the SWI and T1/T2 mapping sequences were not systematically compared. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 476 - 488
Main Authors Wen, Jinyang, Qiao, Jinhan, Tang, Yuanyuan, Zhao, Yun, Yang, Zhaoxia, Wang, Luyun, Tao, Xinwei, Zhou, Xiaoyue, Xia, Liming, Tang, Dazhong, Huang, Lu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published China AME Publishing Company 03.01.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and T1/T2 mapping can be used to detect reperfusion intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, the sensitivity and accuracy of the SWI and T1/T2 mapping sequences were not systematically compared. The study aimed to evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of SWI in patients with IMH, compared with T1/T2 mapping. A prospective study was conducted on consecutive acute STEMI patients who were recruited from January to July 2022. Within 2-6 days after reperfusion treatment, all patients underwent a 3T cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination, including T2-weighted short-tau inversion recovery (T2W-STIR), T1/T2 mapping, and SWI. A total of 36 patients [age, 56.50±17.25 years; males, 83.33% (30/36)] were enrolled. The relative infarct-remote myocardium signal intensity ratio (SIinfarct-remote) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated for each patient on T1/T2 mapping and SWI, and the difference between relative signal intensity-to-noise ratio (rSNR) in the IMH (rSNRIMH) was measured for IMH patients on T1/T2 mapping and SWI. SIinfarct-remote, CNR, and rSNRIMH were compared among the three sequences. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of three sequences by SIinfarct-remote and visual assessment. A total of 26 (72.22%) patients had IMH. Quantitatively, the SIinfarct-remote of three sequences had excellent diagnostic performance for detecting IMH [SWI area under the curve (AUC) =1.000, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.000-1.000 . T1 mapping AUC =0.954, 95% CI: 0.885-1.000 . T2 mapping AUC =0.985, 95% CI: 0.955-1.000; SWI . T1 mapping, P=0.300; SWI . T2 mapping, P=0.188; T1 mapping . T2 mapping, P=0.302). Qualitatively, three sequences had similar performance on detecting IMH (SWI AUC =0.895, 95% CI: 0.784-1.000; T1 mapping AUC =0.835, 95% CI: 0.711-0.958; and T2 mapping AUC =0.855, 95% CI: 0.735-0.974; SWI . T1 mapping, P=0.172; SWI . T2 mapping, P=0.317; T1 mapping . T2 mapping, P=0.710). The rSNRIMH was highest in T1 mapping, followed by T2 mapping and SWI, but SWI had the highest CNR. SWI, as well as T1/T2 mapping, is a feasible and accurate approach for clinical diagnosis of IMH with excellent performance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Contributions: (I) Conception and design: J Wen, J Qiao; (II) Administrative support: L Huang, D Tang, X Tao, X Zhou, L Xia; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: J Qiao, D Tang, L Wang; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: J Wen, J Qiao; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: J Wen, Z Yang; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.
ISSN:2223-4292
2223-4306
DOI:10.21037/qims-23-591