Institutional ownership horizon, corporate social responsibility and shareholder value

A widely held view among policymakers, corporate executives and the media is that short-termism among institutional investors is increasingly prevalent. However, some institutional investors are increasingly vocal about taking a long-term approach, and these investors care about environmental, socia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of business research Vol. 105; pp. 61 - 79
Main Authors Erhemjamts, Otgontsetseg, Huang, Kershen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.12.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A widely held view among policymakers, corporate executives and the media is that short-termism among institutional investors is increasingly prevalent. However, some institutional investors are increasingly vocal about taking a long-term approach, and these investors care about environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. The reality is that investors are a diverse set of stakeholders with various objectives and time horizons. In the academic literature, empirical evidence on the relationship between institutional ownership horizon and corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been mixed. In this paper, we show that institutions with longer (shorter) investment horizons promote (discourage) CSR at the firm level. In addition, the higher the proportion of long-term (short-term) investors, the higher (lower) the effect of CSR on long-term (short-term) buy-and-hold returns. These findings are consistent with the view that short-termism on the part of institutional investors places short-term pressure on companies, and therefore discourages long-term investments that create value.
ISSN:0148-2963
1873-7978
DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.037