Pan-TRK Immunohistochemistry Is Highly Correlated With NTRK3 Gene Rearrangements in Salivary Gland Tumors

• Published in: The American journal of surgical pathology
• Main Authors: Csanyi-Bastien, Marie, Lanic, Marie-Delphine, Beaussire, Ludivine, Ferric, Sandra, François, Arnaud, Meseure, Didier, Jardin, Fabrice, Wassef, Michel, Ruminy, Philippe, Laé, Marick
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.11.2021
• ISSN: 1532-0979
• DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001718

Secretory carcinoma (SC) is characterized by ETV6 rearrangements, most often ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. Given its histologic overlap with other salivary gland tumors (SGTs), SCs can be difficult to diagnose without genetic confirmation. A recently developed pan-TRK (tropomyosin receptor kinase) antibody shows promise for identifying tumors with NTRK (neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor 3) fusions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry in distinguishing SCs from mimics and selecting patients eligible for TRK inhibitor clinical trials. We examined whole-tissue sections from 111 SGTs with molecular characterization, including 26 SCs (23 with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion and 3 with ETV6-RET fusion detected by ligation-dependent reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing and 85 non-SC SGTs (no ETV6-NTRK3 fusion). Immunohistochemistry was performed with a pan-TRK rabbit monoclonal antibody. When any pan-TRK staining (nuclear or cytoplasmic with any staining intensity) was considered to indicate positivity, 22 of 23 SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion (95.7%) and 33 of 85 non-SC (38.8%) salivary neoplasms were positive, mainly basal cell adenoma, pleomorphic adenomas, adenoid cystic carcinomas, and epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas. All SCs with ETV6-RET fusion were entirely negative. When only nuclear pan-TRK staining with any staining intensity was considered positive, 18 of 23 SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion (78.3%) were positive, 11 among them with diffuse staining (>30% of cells). All non-SCs and SCs with ETV6-RET fusion were entirely negative. In comparison to molecular analysis (ligation-dependent reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing), nuclear pan-TRK IHC has a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 100% for diagnosing SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion, 69% and 100% for SCs (all fusions). Pan-TRK is a reasonable screening test for diagnosing SCs among SGTs when taking only nuclear staining into account. Although pan-TRK expression is not entirely sensitive for SCs, nuclear staining is highly specific for SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. The lack of pan-TRK immunoreactivity in a subset of SCs is suggestive of atypical exons 4 to 14 or exons 5 to 14 ETV6-NTRK3 fusion or non-NTRK alternative fusion partners such as ETV6-RET. Pan-TRK staining can serve as a strong diagnostic marker to distinguish SC from it mimics and to select patients eligible for TRK inhibitor clinical trials.