Evaluating Whether a Binary Decision Rule Operates Better Than Chance

We provide an approach to testing whether the accuracy of a binary diagnostic test, which we define as the sum of sensitivity and specificity, is significantly better than chance. We derive an exact confidence interval of size at least 1 — α for the observed accuracy of the test. In addition, we dev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiometrical journal Vol. 41; no. 1; pp. 25 - 31
Main Authors Parker, Robert A., Davis, Roger B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin WILEY-VCH Verlag Berlin GmbH 01.03.1999
WILEY‐VCH Verlag Berlin GmbH
Wiley-VCH
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0323-3847
1521-4036
DOI10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199903)41:1<25::AID-BIMJ25>3.0.CO;2-A

Cover

More Information
Summary:We provide an approach to testing whether the accuracy of a binary diagnostic test, which we define as the sum of sensitivity and specificity, is significantly better than chance. We derive an exact confidence interval of size at least 1 — α for the observed accuracy of the test. In addition, we develop tests to compare the accuracy of two such tests applied to the same subjects. These results offer a method for assessing the accuracy of a test at a single test criterion, in contrast to the standard approach of evaluating the total receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) curve for a test.
Bibliography:istex:BAB1B609418C4EA839E0E0B0A8B3297D4CEDE65B
ArticleID:BIMJ25
ark:/67375/WNG-X7TL9MFP-3
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0323-3847
1521-4036
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199903)41:1<25::AID-BIMJ25>3.0.CO;2-A