Evaluating Whether a Binary Decision Rule Operates Better Than Chance
We provide an approach to testing whether the accuracy of a binary diagnostic test, which we define as the sum of sensitivity and specificity, is significantly better than chance. We derive an exact confidence interval of size at least 1 — α for the observed accuracy of the test. In addition, we dev...
Saved in:
Published in | Biometrical journal Vol. 41; no. 1; pp. 25 - 31 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin
WILEY-VCH Verlag Berlin GmbH
01.03.1999
WILEY‐VCH Verlag Berlin GmbH Wiley-VCH |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0323-3847 1521-4036 |
DOI | 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199903)41:1<25::AID-BIMJ25>3.0.CO;2-A |
Cover
Summary: | We provide an approach to testing whether the accuracy of a binary diagnostic test, which we define as the sum of sensitivity and specificity, is significantly better than chance. We derive an exact confidence interval of size at least 1 — α for the observed accuracy of the test. In addition, we develop tests to compare the accuracy of two such tests applied to the same subjects. These results offer a method for assessing the accuracy of a test at a single test criterion, in contrast to the standard approach of evaluating the total receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) curve for a test. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:BAB1B609418C4EA839E0E0B0A8B3297D4CEDE65B ArticleID:BIMJ25 ark:/67375/WNG-X7TL9MFP-3 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0323-3847 1521-4036 |
DOI: | 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199903)41:1<25::AID-BIMJ25>3.0.CO;2-A |