Exergoeconomic assessment of two novel absorption-ejection heat pumps for the purposes of supermarkets simultaneous heating and refrigeration using NaSCN/NH3, LiNO3/NH3 and H2O/NH3 as working pairs

• Published in: International journal of refrigeration Vol. 101; pp. 178 - 195
• Main Authors: Salehi, S., Yari, M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Paris Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2019; Elsevier Science Ltd
• Subjects: Absorption; Absorption-ejection heat pump; Ammonia; Compression heat pump; Ejection; Ejector; Electricity pricing; Energy costs; Evaporators; Exergo-économie; Exergoeconomics; Feasibility studies; Heat pumps; Heat transfer; Heating; NH3/LiNO3; NH3/NaSCN; Performance enhancement; Pompe à chaleur à absorption-éjection; Pompe à chaleur à compression; Pumps; Refrigeration; Sodium thiocyanate; Supermarkets; Éjecteur; NH3/LiNO3; Pompe à chaleur à absorption-éjection; Compression heat pump; Ejector; Exergoeconomics; Pompe à chaleur à compression; Exergo-économie; NH3/NaSCN; Éjecteur; Absorption-ejection heat pump
• ISSN: 0140-7007; 1879-2081
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2019.03.029

•The proposed AEHP systems have lower values of product cost of up to 60% compared to the conventional heat pumps.•The ECOP in the proposed AEHP systems is lower than that in the conventional heat pumps.•The second proposed AEHP system operating with NH3/NaSCN has lower product cost at higher TGen and TEva2. Two novel absorption-ejection heat pump (AEHP) systems are proposed and their feasibility for supermarkets simultaneous heating and refrigeration is assessed from the viewpoints of thermodynamics and exergoeconomics. The proposed systems’ performance is compared with that of a conventional compression heat pump. In this study, three different working pairs including NaSCN/NH3, LiNO3/NH3 and H2O/NH3 are utilized for the analyses. Simulations show that the ECOP of the conventional heat pump (system 1) is about 8% and 14% lower than that of the first and second proposed AEHP systems (systems 2 & 3), respectively. Moreover, system 3 has a total product cost of up to 10% and 60% lower than that for systems 2 and 1, respectively. Using NH3/LiNO3 solution on the other hand, can better improve the performance at lower refrigeration evaporator temperatures. Regarding the price of electricity, the proposed systems have economic justification only at electricity costs higher than 9 cent/kWh.