Reluctance to report criminal incidents: limited access to justice, social exclusion, and gender

Measures of access to justice mainly use indicators from judicial statistics or legislation whereas subjective perceptions or attitudes are often measured by survey questions related to judicial services. Using Turkey’s Life Satisfaction Survey, we consider reluctance to report an experienced crimin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of law and economics Vol. 55; no. 1; pp. 145 - 166
Main Authors Akarçay, Ayça, Polat, Sezgin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.02.2023
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Measures of access to justice mainly use indicators from judicial statistics or legislation whereas subjective perceptions or attitudes are often measured by survey questions related to judicial services. Using Turkey’s Life Satisfaction Survey, we consider reluctance to report an experienced criminal incident, which is a factual statement, as an objective indicator affecting demand for and access to justice. We identify correlates of reluctance to report and find that poor socio-economic status is negatively associated with the probability of reporting a criminal incident, and that the impact is greater for women. Perceived social pressures related to gender and level of income adversely affect their probability of reporting, whereas men are not affected by social pressure in their decision to report criminal incidents. We then relate the probability of reluctance to report to the probability of giving a no opinion response to questions on perceptions of satisfaction with judicial services. We find that the two are correlated, providing evidence for the relationship between exclusion from access to justice and voice.
ISSN:0929-1261
1572-9990
1572-9346
DOI:10.1007/s10657-022-09748-3