List-method directed forgetting after prolonged retention interval: Further challenges to contemporary accounts

•People can voluntarily forget memory contents when cued to do so.•Such list-method directed forgetting can be persistent, whereas context-dependent forgetting is not.•List-method directed forgetting can persist after both intentional and incidental encoding.•The forgetting is no longer present when...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of memory and language Vol. 106; pp. 18 - 28
Main Authors Abel, Magdalena, Bäuml, Karl-Heinz T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.06.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•People can voluntarily forget memory contents when cued to do so.•Such list-method directed forgetting can be persistent, whereas context-dependent forgetting is not.•List-method directed forgetting can persist after both intentional and incidental encoding.•The forgetting is no longer present when undemanding distractors follow encoding.•The findings challenge the context change and selective rehearsal accounts. Numerous studies on list-method directed forgetting (LMDF) have shown that people can voluntarily forget information when cued to do so. But the cognitive mechanism(s) behind this form of forgetting are still subject to debate. The present study focused on two explanations of LMDF: selective rehearsal and mental context change. Experiment 1 addressed the context-change account by comparing the persistence of LMDF with that of context-dependent forgetting. Results showed that LMDF, but not context-dependent forgetting, was lasting, which is inconsistent with the context-change account. Experiments 2 and 3 addressed the selective-rehearsal account by examining whether persistence of LMDF depends on the status of (intentionally vs. incidentally) encoded items and the type of distractor activity (demanding vs. undemanding) between study and test. Results showed that LMDF was lasting for both intentionally and incidentally studied items but was absent after an undemanding distractor task, which disagrees with the selective-rehearsal account. The present findings challenge both the context-change and the selective-rehearsal account as well as a dual-mechanisms view, which assumes a role of both types of mechanisms in LMDF.
ISSN:0749-596X
1096-0821
DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2019.02.002