The Mental Life of Artifacts. Explications, Questions, Arguments

Our working assumption reads: Every mental property exhibited by a natural system can be exhibited by an artificial system, at least in principle. Is this true? The paper is in two parts. The first part is explicative: What do we mean by ‘natural’ or by ‘artificial’? When are we ready to ascribe thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inZeitschrift für Naturforschung C. A journal of biosciences Vol. 53; no. 7; pp. 455 - 479
Main Authors Buschlinger, Wolfgang, Vollmer, Gerhard, Walter, Henrik
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany Verlag der Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 01.07.1998
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Our working assumption reads: Every mental property exhibited by a natural system can be exhibited by an artificial system, at least in principle. Is this true? The paper is in two parts. The first part is explicative: What do we mean by ‘natural’ or by ‘artificial’? When are we ready to ascribe thinking to a system? We show that sometimes behavior is enough, sometimes underlying mechanisms are decisive. We study the difference between simulation and realization of a property and the kinds of explanation used in the philosophy of mind. The second part is argumentative. We collect and discuss positive arguments for and critical arguments against the working hypothesis. No decisive counterargument is found
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0939-5075
1865-7125
DOI:10.1515/znc-1998-7-803