Complexity of majority monopoly and signed domination problems
We consider approximability of two natural variants of classical dominating set problem, namely minimum majority monopoly and minimum signed domination. In the minimum majority monopoly problem, the objective is to find a smallest size subset X ⊆ V in a given graph G = ( V , E ) such that | N [ v ]...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of discrete algorithms (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Vol. 10; pp. 49 - 60 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
2012
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We consider approximability of two natural variants of classical dominating set problem, namely minimum majority monopoly and minimum signed domination. In the minimum majority monopoly problem, the objective is to find a smallest size subset
X
⊆
V
in a given graph
G
=
(
V
,
E
)
such that
|
N
[
v
]
∩
X
|
⩾
1
2
|
N
[
v
]
|
, for at least half of the vertices in
V. On the other hand, given a graph
G
=
(
V
,
E
)
, in the signed domination problem one needs to find a function
f
:
V
→
{
−
1
,
1
}
such that
f
(
N
[
v
]
)
⩾
1
, for all
v
∈
V
, and the cost
f
(
V
)
=
∑
v
∈
V
f
(
v
)
is minimized.
We show that minimum majority monopoly and minimum signed domination cannot be approximated within a factor of
(
1
2
−
ϵ
)
ln
n
and
(
1
3
−
ϵ
)
ln
n
, respectively, for any
ϵ
>
0
, unless
NP
⊆
Dtime
(
n
O
(
log
log
n
)
)
. We also prove that, if Δ is the maximum degree of a vertex in the graph, then both problems cannot be approximated within a factor of
ln
Δ
−
D
ln
ln
Δ
, for some constant
D, unless
P
=
NP
.
On the positive side, we give
ln
(
Δ
+
1
)
-factor approximation algorithm for minimum majority monopoly problem for general graphs. We show that minimum majority monopoly problem is
APX
-complete for graphs with degree at most 3 and at least 2 and minimum signed domination problem is
APX
-complete, for 3-regular graphs. For 3-regular graphs, these two problems are approximable within a factor of
4
3
(asymptotically) and 1.6, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1570-8667 1570-8675 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jda.2011.12.019 |