A genealogical and archaeological examination of the development of corporate governance and disciplinary power in English local government c.1970-2010

The paper seeks to enhance our understanding of the interaction between the development of disciplinary power in western liberal society and Foucault’s writings on governmentality, through examination of the political processes resulting from the largest public scandal in the UK, the Poulson scandal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAccounting, organizations and society Vol. 109; p. 101466
Main Authors Ferry, Laurence, Funnell, Warwick, Oldroyd, David
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The paper seeks to enhance our understanding of the interaction between the development of disciplinary power in western liberal society and Foucault’s writings on governmentality, through examination of the political processes resulting from the largest public scandal in the UK, the Poulson scandal of the early 1970s. The first research motive is to uncover any additional insights or hidden understandings that can be derived by applying Foucauldian historiographical and governmental perspectives as strengthened by Dean’s (2010) analytics of government to the history of corporate governance in English local authorities over the forty years following Poulson. We argue that the continual process of intervention, investigation and prescription by central government set in motion by the scandal resulted in an increase in disciplinary power within local government by changing the expectations of council officials, elected representatives and politicians in Westminster through the normalisation of these intrusions and the spirit of dependency and compliance which resulted. Secondly, the paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of the analytics approach in a complex situation involving many genealogical disruptions to the status quo over a long time-period; and whilst the paper found the method helpful, limitations emerged regarding its claims to empirical certainty through precise questioning. Finally, the paper examines the significance of countering corruption as a motivating factor in the rise of disciplinary power in English local government, which it finds as limited.
ISSN:0361-3682
1873-6289
DOI:10.1016/j.aos.2023.101466