Defect structure of ZnGeP2 crystals grown in the furnaces with tube diameters of 70 and 130 mm

•The defect structure of ZnGeP2 crystals grown in furnace tubes with different diameters was studied by X-Ray topography and X-Ray diffractometry.•The crystal grown in the furnace with a large tube diameter shows only single dislocations and growth striae.•The crystal grown in the furnace with a lar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of crystal growth Vol. 580; p. 126479
Main Authors Kolesnikov, A.V., Vasilenko, A.P., Trukhanov, E.M., Lei, Z.T., Zhu, C.Q., Yang, C.H., Verozubova, G.A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 15.02.2022
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•The defect structure of ZnGeP2 crystals grown in furnace tubes with different diameters was studied by X-Ray topography and X-Ray diffractometry.•The crystal grown in the furnace with a large tube diameter shows only single dislocations and growth striae.•The crystal grown in the furnace with a large tube diameter shows much higher transparency than the crystal grown in a smaller furnace. The crystal structures of two ZnGeP2 crystals grown by the Vertical Bridgman method in different furnaces were compared. The furnace tube diameter was 70 mm for the first crystal and 130 mm – for the second one. The diameter of both crystals was 30 mm. The radial temperature profiles of the furnaces show different curvatures in the growth zone. For the first crystal the profile was slightly concave, whereas, for the second one, it was flat. The structure was analyzed by X-ray diffractometry and topography methods. In the first crystal, the dislocation density changed from 102 cm−2 in the initial growth region of the sample to 104 cm−2 at the last-to-freeze end. Low-angle grain boundaries were observed. The second crystal contained only single dislocations. Both crystals showed growth striae. After thermal annealing (both crystals were treated under identical conditions), the second crystal showed a much better optical transparency than the first one.
ISSN:0022-0248
1873-5002
DOI:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2021.126479