On a slippery slope to intolerance: Individual difference in slippery slope beliefs predict outgroup negativity

•Slippery slope arguments, that small actions have severe consequences, are common.•The likelihood of believing these arguments reflects an individual difference.•A measure of slippery slope beliefs predicts negative intergroup attitudes.•Slippery slope beliefs predict agreement with real-world slip...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of research in personality Vol. 94; p. 104141
Main Authors Adelman, Levi, Verkuyten, Maykel, Cárdenas, Diana, Yogeeswaran, Kumar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.10.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Slippery slope arguments, that small actions have severe consequences, are common.•The likelihood of believing these arguments reflects an individual difference.•A measure of slippery slope beliefs predicts negative intergroup attitudes.•Slippery slope beliefs predict agreement with real-world slippery slope arguments. Slippery slope beliefs capture the idea that a non-problematic action will lead to unpreventable and harmful outcomes. While this idea has been examined in legal and philosophical literatures, there has been no psychological research into the individual propensity to hold slippery slope beliefs. Across five studies and six samples (combined N = 5,974), we developed and tested an individual difference measure of slippery slope beliefs, finding that it predicted intolerance of outgroup freedoms above and beyond key demographic and psychological predictors (Studies 1–2 and 5). We also found that slippery slope beliefs predict intolerance of debated behaviors in two countries (Study 3), and that it predicted agreement with real-world slippery slope examples across the political spectrum (Studies 4–5).
ISSN:0092-6566
1095-7251
DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104141