Characterization and comparison of whey proteomes from bovine and donkey colostrum and mature milk

As a small species of milk source, donkey milk has attracted widespread attention due to its high nutritional value. However, its composition is substantially different from the most widely consumed milk source—bovine milk. This study was aimed to conduct a qualitative proteomic analysis of donkey w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood science & technology Vol. 158; p. 113113
Main Authors Li, Mohan, Dong, Yushi, Li, Weixuan, Shen, Xinyu, Abdlla, Rayhnigul, Chen, Jiali, Cao, Xueyan, Yue, Xiqing
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 15.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:As a small species of milk source, donkey milk has attracted widespread attention due to its high nutritional value. However, its composition is substantially different from the most widely consumed milk source—bovine milk. This study was aimed to conduct a qualitative proteomic analysis of donkey whey proteins (DWPs) and bovine whey proteins (BWPs). Specifically, 981, 988, 1127, and 1534 whey proteins were characterized in donkey colostrum (DC), donkey mature milk (DM), bovine colostrum (BC), and bovine mature milk (BM), respectively. Among these, 477 common whey proteins were identified in the four groups, whereas 43, 27, 105, and 476 unique whey proteins were identified in DC, DM, BC, and BM, respectively. The potential functions of these proteins, as well as the pathways involved, were further analyzed using bioinformatics. Our results provide a comprehensive understanding of the compositions of DWPs and BWPs and provide a theoretical basis for the development of whey protein nutrition. ●981, 988, 1127, and 1534 whey proteins were identified in DC, DM, BC, and BM.●477 common whey proteins were identified in the four groups.●The top 10 enriched GO terms of whey proteins for each groups were analyzed.●The top 15 pathways of whey proteins for each groups were performed.
ISSN:0023-6438
1096-1127
DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113113