Agronomic analysis of nitrogen performance indicators in intensive arable cropping systems: An appraisal of big data from commercial farms

• Published in: Field crops research Vol. 269; p. 108176
• Main Authors: Silva, João Vasco, van Ittersum, Martin K., ten Berge, Hein F.M., Spätjens, Léon, Tenreiro, Tomás R., Anten, Niels P.R., Reidsma, Pytrik
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 15.07.2021
• Subjects: Arable farming; N surplus; N-use efficiency; Sustainable intensification; The Netherlands; The Netherlands; N-use efficiency; N surplus; Arable farming; Sustainable intensification
• ISSN: 0378-4290; 1872-6852
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108176

•The framework of the EU N Expert Panel was applied to farmer field data covering the period 2015–2017.•N-use efficiency (NUE) was on average 0.7–1.0 kg N kg−1 N for Dutch arable crops.•Annual N surplus (Ns) was on average 20–80 kg N ha−1 for Dutch arable crops.•In Dutch farming, technological advances without reducing N inputs are unlikely to improve NUE or N surplus.•Highest NUE and lowest Ns can be achieved with mineral fertilisers, which comes with trade-offs at national level. Nitrogen (N) management is important for farmers to balance production, economic and environmental performance of their farms. This is particularly true in the intensive cropping systems of northwest Europe where tuber, root and bulb crops are cultivated in rotation with cereal crops and where an intensive livestock sector makes organic manures available at low cost for arable farmers. Here, we build upon a large database of farmer field data to assess mineral and organic fertiliser N performance, and its determinants, for the major arable crops in the Netherlands according to the guidelines provided by the EU N Expert Panel (EUNEP). The EUNEP framework quantifies N outputs and N inputs, N-use efficiency as the ratio between N outputs and N inputs (NUE in kg N output harvested per kg N input) and N surplus as the difference between N inputs and N outputs (Ns in kg N ha−1). As a next step, biophysical and crop management determinants of N performance were explored using data from different years, soil types and N management in relation to the amount, source, time and method of N applied. NUE was on average ca. 0.95 kg N kg−1 N for seed potato, sugar beet and spring onion, 0.87 kg N kg−1 N for ware potato, ca. 0.80 kg N kg−1 N for starch potato and winter wheat and, ca. 0.70 kg N kg−1 N for spring barley, all within or above the target range of 0.50–0.90 kg N kg−1 N proposed by the EUNEP. Ns was on average below the EUNEP threshold of 80 kg N ha−1 for all crops: 78 kg N ha−1 for ware potato and winter wheat, ca. 70 kg N ha−1 for starch potato, ca. 50 kg N ha−1 for spring barley, ca. 25 kg N ha−1 for sugar beet and spring onion and less than 20 kg N ha−1 for seed potato. Although average Ns was below 80 kg N ha−1, ca. 40% of the ware potato, starch potato and winter wheat fields analyzed had Ns above this threshold. The relatively high NUE combined with high Ns for most crops are the result of high N outputs (yields) combined with high N application rates. Moreover, high NUE and small Ns were mostly associated with smaller N application rates and with the use of mineral fertilisers instead of organic fertilisers, while there were no clear relationships between the two indicators on the one hand with N application time or method on the other. We conclude NUE and Ns were on average within the EUNEP target range for most crops, but there are still a considerable number of under-performing farms where increases in NUE and reductions in Ns are possible through reducing N inputs. We recommend future research to assess the benefits of organic fertilisers from a circularity perspective at regional and national levels and to cross-validate the crop-specific results presented in this study with NUE assessments at cropping systems level.