Molecular Markers Highlight Variation within and among Kentucky Bluegrass Varieties and Accessions
ABSTRACT Assessing relationships among germplasm and cultivars of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) is limited to field evaluations or a small set of molecular markers. To improve the efficiency of characterizing Kentucky bluegrass cultivars and germplasm, this study was designed to develop a la...
Saved in:
Published in | Crop science Vol. 53; no. 5; pp. 2245 - 2254 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Madison
The Crop Science Society of America, Inc
01.09.2013
American Society of Agronomy |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ABSTRACT
Assessing relationships among germplasm and cultivars of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) is limited to field evaluations or a small set of molecular markers. To improve the efficiency of characterizing Kentucky bluegrass cultivars and germplasm, this study was designed to develop a larger set of robust molecular makers and a concise panel of cultivars to assess relationships of Kentucky bluegrass. An extensive library of simple sequence repeat markers was developed and used to assess relationships among and within 24 cultivars and accessions. Plants generally grouped as cultivars in cluster analysis, but molecular outlying plants and phenotypic off‐type plants were found in 15 of the entries. The cultivars represented the major Kentucky bluegrass classification types and were consistent with previous reports. Salt‐tolerant National Plant Germplasm System accessions were placed in context with the cultivars and grouped closest to the Eurasian/Common type cultivar Kenblue. Similarity of plants within cultivars varied from 60 to 98% but never reached 100%. These data showed that, with two exceptions, the cultivars could represent the major Kentucky bluegrass classification types and also that molecular variation exists within putatively apomictic plants. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture |
ISSN: | 0011-183X 1435-0653 |
DOI: | 10.2135/cropsci2013.02.0110 |