Contrast improvement in a new radiotherapy imaging system
The aim of this paper is to compare the EC-L Kodak system for radiation therapy beam localization with a conventional one that could be daily employed in a radiotherapy department. The main purpose of portal images is to verify the treatment volume in actual clinical conditions. Low contrast is the...
Saved in:
Published in | Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Vol. 175; no. 4; pp. 182 - 184 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
München
Springer
01.04.1999
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The aim of this paper is to compare the EC-L Kodak system for radiation therapy beam localization with a conventional one that could be daily employed in a radiotherapy department.
The main purpose of portal images is to verify the treatment volume in actual clinical conditions. Low contrast is the main constraint affecting portal film image.
Kodak proposes a new imaging system (film and cassette) characterized by contrast enhancement as imaging standard for radiotherapy. The evaluation of system contrast was carried out by using a step-wedge consisting in 4 60 x 60 mm plexiglas steps and an anthropomorphic phantom. Portal films were exposed to a 6 MV photon beam by a linear accelerator (Varian Clinac 1800) with a 250 x 340 mm field size at the 1000 mm source film distance. The 2 imaging system performances were evaluated analyzing the image optical density.
The use of the Kodak system results in a real contrast improvement, so it is satisfactory to describe the field placement as to the region of interest.
The most critical characteristic attaining this method regards low contrast, i. e. the small optical density difference existing between different anatomical regions on the film. Since radiographic techniques can significantly influence quality of portal films, the adequate choice of film and screen combination, as well as the exposure technique is particularly useful in a radiotherapy quality assurance program. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0179-7158 1439-099X |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF02742361 |