Governance structures, resource mobilization, and organizational performance of community forest enterprises: Evidence from China

Community forestry enterprises (CFEs) have diverse governance structures impacting their organizational performance, while limited research has explored the drivers and impact of these diversified institutions. Adopting a comparative case approach, this study examines three types of CFE models in so...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inForest policy and economics Vol. 163; p. 103229
Main Author Yiwen, Zhang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.06.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Community forestry enterprises (CFEs) have diverse governance structures impacting their organizational performance, while limited research has explored the drivers and impact of these diversified institutions. Adopting a comparative case approach, this study examines three types of CFE models in southern China—shareholding forest farms, community-corporation partnerships, and cooperative reforestation—to understand the selection of the CFE's governance structures and their impact on organizational performance from the resource mobilization perspective. In three cases, the ranking of overall performance from the highest to lowest is cooperative reforestation, shareholding forest farm, and community-corporation partnership. However, all three models have their advantages and limitations, and social capital and human capital are critical for all CEF types. This study showcases the institutional diversity of CFEs, offers insights beyond the archetypical distinctions of CFEs identified in the literature, and illuminates the complex effects of organizational structures on CFEs' organizational performance. These findings may guide CFEs in optimizing their institutional arrangements according to their unique circumstances. •Analyzes three distinct CFE models in southern China.•Explores CFE's diverse governance structures and their impact.•Uses resource mobilization lens to study CFE's performance.•Advocates direct democracy for improved decision-making.•Emphasizes legal and policy adaptations for CFEs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1389-9341
1872-7050
DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103229