Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of L-dopa plasma concentrations and clinical effects in Parkinson's disease after Sinemet
Eleven parkinsonian patients participated in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study in an attempt to model levodopa (L-DOPA) plasma concentrations to clinical effect. Carbidopa 25 mg/L-DOPA 100 mg (Sinemet 25/100) was given orally, and blood samples were obtained before and serially for 4 hours aft...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical neuropharmacology Vol. 12; no. 2; p. 91 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.04.1989
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Eleven parkinsonian patients participated in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study in an attempt to model levodopa (L-DOPA) plasma concentrations to clinical effect. Carbidopa 25 mg/L-DOPA 100 mg (Sinemet 25/100) was given orally, and blood samples were obtained before and serially for 4 hours after the dose. Effect measurements were obtained with each blood sample and included tapping score, timed walking, and global assessment of motor function. Mean L-DOPA plasma concentrations were fitted to a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. A time-wise plot of modeled plasma L-DOPA concentrations versus mean effect measurements revealed a counter-clockwise hysteresis. Effect compartment concentrations were determined by a least squares approach, which determined elimination rate constants by minimizing hysteresis. Half-times for the equilibration between plasma and the effect compartment were 0.39 h for tapping, 0.36 h for walking, and 0.34 h for the global score. Pharmacodynamic data were fit best with an Emax model with baseline effect for tapping (Emax = 53.2 taps/60 s, EC50 = 0.58 microgram/ml) and global score (Emax set at 5.0 by limits of scale, EC50 = 2.53 micrograms/ml). A linear model best described the relationship between predicted effect site concentration and timed walking. L-DOPA plasma concentrations after oral Sinemet did not correlate well with clinical response because clinical response lags behind plasma concentrations. Half-times for equilibration between plasma and the effect site were similar for all of the effects measured. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0362-5664 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00002826-198904000-00002 |