Individual Nuclei Differ in Their Sensitivity to the Cytoplasmic Inducers of DNA Synthesis: Implications for the Origin of Cell Cycle Variability

Nuclei of multinucleate cells generally initiate DNA synthesis simultaneously, suggesting that the timing of DNA synthesis depends upon the appearance of a cytoplasmic signal. In contrast, intact nuclei from quiescent mammalian cells initiate DNA synthesisasynchronouslyin cell-free extracts ofXenopu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inExperimental cell research Vol. 229; no. 2; pp. 350 - 359
Main Authors Hola, M., Howard, M., Nawaz, F.N., Castleden, S., Brooks, R.F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 15.12.1996
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Nuclei of multinucleate cells generally initiate DNA synthesis simultaneously, suggesting that the timing of DNA synthesis depends upon the appearance of a cytoplasmic signal. In contrast, intact nuclei from quiescent mammalian cells initiate DNA synthesisasynchronouslyin cell-free extracts ofXenopuseggs, despite the common environment. Here we show that the two nuclei of permeabilized binucleate cells enter DNA synthesis coordinately in egg extracts, as they doin vivo,with different pairs of nuclei initiating replication at different times. This indicates that the two nuclei of a binucleate cell are identical in their sensitivity to the inducers of DNA synthesis in egg extracts; this sensitivity varies in general between the nuclei of unrelated cells. The asynchrony of DNA synthesis shown by unrelated nuclei in egg extracts is therefore not an artifact of the cell-free system but a reflection of genuine differences preexisting within the intact cell. Evidence that these differences between nuclei are responsible for a substantial fraction of G1variability in living cells is presented.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0014-4827
1090-2422
DOI:10.1006/excr.1996.0380