'Time to Wake Up': Climate change advocacy in a polarized Congress, 1996-2015

Scholars who study the failure of climate change policy in the United States tend to focus on the mechanics of denial and the coordinated efforts of political operatives, conservative think tanks, and partisan news outlets to cast doubt on what has become overwhelming scientific consensus. In contra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental politics Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 538 - 558
Main Authors Guber, Deborah Lynn, Bohr, Jeremiah, Dunlap, Riley E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 07.06.2021
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Scholars who study the failure of climate change policy in the United States tend to focus on the mechanics of denial and the coordinated efforts of political operatives, conservative think tanks, and partisan news outlets to cast doubt on what has become overwhelming scientific consensus. In contrast, we address a factor that has been understudied until now - the role of climate change advocacy in the U.S. Congress. Using quantitative text analysis on a corpus of floor speeches published in the Congressional Record between 1996 and 2015, we find notable differences in the language partisans use. Democrats communicate in ways that are message-based, emphasizing the weight of scientific evidence, while Republicans tend towards a softer, cue-based narrative based on anecdotes and storytelling. We end with a discussion of what climate change advocates can hope to accomplish through the 'politics of talk,' especially in an age of heightened polarization.
ISSN:0964-4016
1743-8934
DOI:10.1080/09644016.2020.1786333