Building legal literacy in organisations that support people experiencing multiple disadvantage

• Published in: The Journal of social welfare & family law Vol. 45; no. 1; pp. 11 - 26
• Main Authors: McCormack, Fiona, Machin, Richard, Riley, Victoria, Spyropoulos, Konstantinos, Dunn, Karen, Gidlow, Christopher James
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Abingdon Routledge 02.01.2023; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Advocacy; Case studies; Consumers; Criminal justice; Criminal justice system; Customers; Development policy; Development programs; Entitlement; Homeless people; Housing; legal literacy; Literacy; Mental health; multiple disadvantage; Organizations; qualitative study; specialist welfare advice; Stakeholders; Substance abuse; Welfare benefits
• ISSN: 0964-9069; 1469-9621
• DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2023.2175548

We present a case study of specialist welfare advice and advocacy for people experiencing multiple disadvantage (i.e. a combination of homelessness, contact with the criminal justice system, substance misuse, mental ill health). Drawing primarily on qualitative interviews with staff and stakeholders, we demonstrate the need for, and success of, specialist benefits advice for this customer group. Substantial financial gains were awarded, providing a greater level of security and stability, which increased customers' housing options. We highlight a need for greater recognition across organisations that work with customers experiencing multiple disadvantage, that welfare benefits are a legal entitlement. Implications for policy and practice are discussed, including the importance of: developing confidence and a 'law informed' mindset in frontline staff; advisors building relationships with staff to achieve this; preparatory work with partner organisations to develop a shared understanding of what is involved and expectations. Ultimately, a culture of legal literacy must be cultivated at the individual (frontline staff) and organisational (partner host) levels. Stakeholders had concerns about the future of such initiatives in the context of further funding cuts; there is a risk that legal literacy development programmes become marginalised at a time when they are most needed.