Billboards and Turnout: A Randomized Field Experiment
Scholars argue that mass media appeals and other examples of communications that provide "noticeable reminders" to vote should elevate voter turnout (Dale and Strauss 2009 ), but a wide range of field experimental studies show that messages delivered via untargeted and impersonal means (su...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of political marketing Vol. 14; no. 4; pp. 391 - 404 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Binghamton
Routledge
02.10.2015
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Scholars argue that mass media appeals and other examples of communications that provide "noticeable reminders" to vote should elevate voter turnout (Dale and Strauss
2009
), but a wide range of field experimental studies show that messages delivered via untargeted and impersonal means (such as mass media) are ineffective (Green and Gerber
2008
). We test these competing hypotheses in a randomized, mass media field experiment using billboard advertisements to mobilize participation in local elections taking place in November 2007. Despite that outdoor advertising is commonly used in political campaigns to widely reach citizens, no study of which we are aware has experimentally tested the causal effects of billboard advertising on voter turnout. Our findings suggest that billboards are ineffective in generating higher levels of voter turnout. We discuss these results in comparison with other mass media advertisements and other get-out-the-vote methods. Experimental replication and extension is necessary to probe further the impact of outdoor advertising on voting behavior. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1537-7857 1537-7865 |
DOI: | 10.1080/15377857.2015.1086141 |