Defending the Profession: U.S. Journalists' Role Understanding in the Era of Fake News

Using theories of journalists' role perception, we analyzed how U.S. mainstream journalists defined "fake news," and signaled to audiences the difference between their own news stories and "fake news" to defend their profession and a particular narrative of their profession...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournalism practice Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 226 - 244
Main Authors Jahng, Mi Rosie, Eckert, Stine, Metzger-Riftkin, Jade
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 07.02.2023
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Fake news
journalism
journalists
media literacy
professional role perception
U.S. journalists
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Using theories of journalists' role perception, we analyzed how U.S. mainstream journalists defined "fake news," and signaled to audiences the difference between their own news stories and "fake news" to defend their profession and a particular narrative of their profession as crucial to democracy. Results from interviews yield a split definition of "fake news:" journalists' own understanding of the term and how journalists see their audiences apply the term. Participants defended their news reporting process by highlighting traditional best practices and new tools to verify information. In order to justify their profession's purpose and legitimacy in democracy, journalists emphasized strategies of highlighting institutional history, transparency, and community engagement.
ISSN:1751-2786
1751-2794
DOI:10.1080/17512786.2021.1919177