Environmental justice in Phoenix, Arizona: a neighbourhood deficit and asset score

This paper describes the development and application of two cumulative impact scores - a neighbourhood deficit and an asset score - in Phoenix, Arizona. The deficit score was designed and used as a tool for identifying environmental, energy, and health vulnerabilities while the asset score was used...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLocal environment Vol. 26; no. 6; pp. 692 - 718
Main Authors Boucher, Jean Léon, Levenda, Anthony M., Carpenter, Caleb, Morales-Guerrero, Jorge, Karwat, Darshan M. A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 03.06.2021
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Air pollution
asset-based community development
Assets
Asthma
Census
Censuses
Churches
Community
cumulative impact
Energy
Energy poverty
Environmental impact
Environmental justice
Grocery industry
Heuristic
Intersectionality
Neighborhoods
Pollutants
Poverty
Reengineering
Residents
Retail stores
Schools
social vulnerability
Socioeconomic factors
United States > US
Arizona
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This paper describes the development and application of two cumulative impact scores - a neighbourhood deficit and an asset score - in Phoenix, Arizona. The deficit score was designed and used as a tool for identifying environmental, energy, and health vulnerabilities while the asset score was used to identify possible relief from these neighbourhood deficits. The design and use of these scores were the result of a collaboration between a community group, Chispa Arizona, and re-Engineered, a research laboratory at Arizona State University. The neighbourhood deficit score (NDS) aggregates a number of phenomena inclusive of: environmental burdens (such as criteria air pollutants and incidence of asthma), socio-economic variables (that may exacerbate the impacts of environmental burdens), and energy poverty. In contrast, the neighbourhood asset score (NAS) assembles a range of community assets (like churches, schools, parks, and grocery stores) which residents might leverage to ameliorate intersectional deficits. We geospatially and statistically examine the NDS, NAS, and demographic data at the census tract level. We find that census tracts with higher proportions of poverty and minority populations are significantly correlated with a higher NDS, and that higher NAS values are more centrally located and offset from the high NDS areas. We believe the NDS and NAS provide a heuristic and useful tool for identifying community vulnerabilities and issues of environmental justice.
ISSN:1354-9839
1469-6711
DOI:10.1080/13549839.2021.1916899