Advances in the high bootstrap fraction regime on DIII-D towards the Q  =  5 mission of ITER steady state

Recent EAST/DIII-D joint experiments on the high poloidal beta βP regime in DIII-D have extended operation with internal transport barriers (ITBs) and excellent energy confinement (H98y2 ~ 1.6) to higher plasma current, for lower q95     7.0, and more balanced neutral beam injection (NBI) (torque in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNuclear fusion Vol. 57; no. 5; pp. 56008 - 56014
Main Authors Qian, J.P., Garofalo, A.M., Gong, X.Z., Ren, Q.L., Ding, S.Y., Solomon, W.M., Xu, G.S., Grierson, B.A., Guo, W.F., Holcomb, C.T., McClenaghan, J., McKee, G.R., Pan, C.K., Huang, J., Staebler, G.M., Wan, B.N.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States IOP Publishing 20.03.2017
IOP Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recent EAST/DIII-D joint experiments on the high poloidal beta βP regime in DIII-D have extended operation with internal transport barriers (ITBs) and excellent energy confinement (H98y2 ~ 1.6) to higher plasma current, for lower q95     7.0, and more balanced neutral beam injection (NBI) (torque injection  <  2 Nm), for lower plasma rotation than previous results (Garofalo et al, IAEA 2014, Gong et al 2014 IAEA Int. Conf. on Fusion Energy). Transport analysis and experimental measurements at low toroidal rotation suggest that the E  ×  B shear effect is not key to the ITB formation in these high βP discharges. Experiments and TGLF modeling show that the Shafranov shift has a key stabilizing effect on turbulence. Extrapolation of the DIII-D results using a 0D model shows that with the improved confinement, the high bootstrap fraction regime could achieve fusion gain Q  =  5 in ITER at βN ~ 2.9 and q95 ~ 7. With the optimization of q(0), the required improved confinement is achievable when using 1.5D TGLF-SAT1 for transport simulations. Results reported in this paper suggest that the DIII-D high βP scenario could be a candidate for ITER steady state operation.
Bibliography:International Atomic Energy Agency
NF-101545.R1
USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE)
National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Program of China
FC02-04ER54698; AC52-07NA27344; FG02-08ER54999; AC02-09CH11466; FG02-07ER54917; FG02-06ER54871; 2015GB102004; 2014GB106002; 2014GB103000
LLNL-JRNL-830401
ISSN:0029-5515
1741-4326
DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/aa626a