Militarism and the mutually assured destruction of climate change

During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in nuclear deterrence as part of a larger strategic vision. Known as MAD or Mutually Assured Destruction, it included widespread investments in nuclear arsenals and delivery systems that would ensure nuclear capability in the advent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSpace & polity Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 62 - 66
Main Authors Inwood, Joshua F.J., Tyner, James A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 02.01.2022
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Arsenals
carbon foot print
Climate change
Cold War
Destruction
Deterrence
Militarism
Mutually Assured Destruction
Strikes
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in nuclear deterrence as part of a larger strategic vision. Known as MAD or Mutually Assured Destruction, it included widespread investments in nuclear arsenals and delivery systems that would ensure nuclear capability in the advent of a first strike by an adversary. We revisit MAD in the context of the unfolding climate catastrophe and the context of growing tensions between the United States and China. Each government is investing in defense capabilities. Given the unfolding carbon footprint such a struggle will entail, even if China or the United States never engage in actual combat, we ask: does an unfolding military buildup between the U.S. and China assure our mutual destruction?
ISSN:1356-2576
1470-1235
DOI:10.1080/13562576.2022.2052720