Upward Departures from Structured Recommendations in Juvenile Court Dispositions: The Intersection of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender

• Published in: Justice quarterly Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 514 - 540
• Main Authors: Lehmann, Peter S., Meldrum, Ryan C., Greenwald, Mark A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Abingdon Routledge 15.04.2020; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Decision making; Ethnicity; guidelines; Judges & magistrates; Juvenile courts; Juvenile justice; labeling theory; Minority & ethnic groups; race and ethnicity; Racial differences; Recidivism; Sanctions; Youth
• ISSN: 0741-8825; 1745-9109
• DOI: 10.1080/07418825.2018.1531143

Much prior research has examined racial and ethnic disparities in juvenile court interventions, and the evidence suggests that minority youth are sanctioned more harshly than similarly situated White youth. Additionally, scholars have explored the potential negative consequences of juvenile justice contact, and some research indicates that more intensive juvenile court dispositions are associated with increased reoffending, particularly among minority youth. What is unknown, however, is the relevance of race, ethnicity, and gender for these outcomes under a structured disposition guidelines system, which is intended to aid judges' decision-making and reduce recidivism following justice system intervention. Analysis of youth sanctioned under Florida's disposition matrix (N = 56,913) shows that Black youth are more likely to receive upward departures from the guideline-recommended sanctions and that the increased likelihood of recidivism resulting from receiving an upward departure is particularly pronounced among minority males. The implications of these findings are discussed.